Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Galaxy Buds 3 Pro results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 2,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,654 of 37,536 keywords). This Galaxy Buds 3 Pro is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
13%Galaxy Buds 3 Pro (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos