Topic summary
41% 30 analyzed articles/videos 18,589 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 8,681 hits . Analysis detected 77,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 94,031 analyzed words across 29 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,008 of 15,447 topics). This Russia is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Russia
Topic details
Total words: 94,031
Article count: 29
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score29 analyzed articles94K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst