Author summary
45%3 analyzed articles/videos1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joanna Kakissis results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 749 hits. Analysis detected 7,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,753 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (4,093 of 6,628 authors). This Joanna Kakissis is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Joanna Kakissis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
39%Joanna Kakissis (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,753
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510038.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate