Publication summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jefferson Public Radio results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 344 hits . Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 83% (70 of 398 publications). This Jefferson Public Radio is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 16.1% 16.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 9.7% 9.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Publication 16.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 9.7%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst