Topic summary
⁠64%3 analyzed articles/videos1,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Restaurant Reviews results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,217 hits. Analysis detected 10,087 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,820 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,561 of 15,599 topics). This Restaurant Reviews is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Restaurant Reviews
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.6%15.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.5%14.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos