'It looks like a war.' How a $38 Armenian brisket sandwich ignited debate over culture and cost 11%

By Stephanie Breijo70%

7/13/2026, 10:21:53 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 1,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,079 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,666 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

On the plate, it’s a half pound of Wagyu brisket smothered in pickles and Mornay sauce, all cradled in freshly made pita bread. 
On the internet, it’s a cultural flash point. 
In late June, the viral basturma brisket sandwich from Glendale restaurant Yerord Mas found itself at the center of hundreds of comments dissecting cost, tradition and respect after a content creator deemed the sandwich “not worth” its $38 price tag. 
But it was the influencer’s additional jab of “F— the traditional style” that especially upset Yerord Mas chef-owner Arthur Grigoryan. 
He called creator Richie Gaines’ words "offensive" and announced that Yerord Mas would no longer serve the sandwich that L.A. 
Times restaurant critic Bill Addison, in his review of the restaurant, said was "phenomenal, a statement piece of excess and engineering ... easily enough to feed two people." 
Days later, after receiving numerous calls, texts and online messages asking him to continue serving the basturma sandwich, including from legendary kebab and rotisserie shop Zankou Chicken, Grigoryan decided to keep the sandwich on the menu after all. 
The incident brings into stark relief an influencer culture that has set local restaurateurs at odds with content creators. 
Instagram, TikTok and Reddit boards are filled with roughly 1,000 comments regarding the Yerord Mas "ragequit" debate, some discrediting the restaurant and others the influencer. 
Gaines said his TikTok post about the sandwich, which has racked up more than 125,500 views, was never intended as a critique of Armenian culture. 
But Grigoryan said Gaines had echoed a long-standing debate surrounding the cost and “worth” of food that’s traditionally deemed "cheap." 
Admittedly unfamiliar with Armenian food or basturma, Gaines compared the brisket sandwich to a pastrami-and-pickle sandwich at a Jewish deli. 
Langer’s charges $24 for a plain hot-pastrami sandwich, while New York’s Katz’s Delicatessen charges $28.95. 
Compared with those prices, Gaines deemed the Yerord Mas sandwich “not worth it.” 
“I don’t like comparisons like that because whether people realize it or not,” Grigoryan said in an interview, “you’re essentially saying, ‘Oh, this culture is better than this culture.’” 
The sandwich first gained popularity through a pop-up he launched in 2018 with with his wife, co-owner and manager Takouhi Petrosyan. 
In January, they opened Yerord Mas as a bricks-and-mortar restaurant in a strip mall, offering the sandwich alongside traditional Armenian dishes influenced by the chef's family roots and travels through Egypt, Lebanon, Syria and other parts of the Levant. 
“It’s crazy, ever since we opened, there’s at least four or five subreddit debates about this sandwich,” Grigoryan said. 
“It looks like a war. 
Half the people are defending us, and then the other half are just like, ‘Oh, they’re hiding behind the curtain of culture to justify the price.’” 
Gaines, who is also a stand-up comedian, called Grigoryan’s response to his post “so bizarre,” “kind of slanderous” and “like a real-life ‘Seinfeld’ episode,” likening the Glendale chef to the show’s famously withholding Soup Nazi. 
He began posting critiques of viral L.A. dishes after a work injury and never expected them to take off. 
“I would go to a lot of these places and some of them would be awesome,” he said. 
“I want them all to be awesome  but there’s so many places I’ve been to where I’m like, ‘Why did I come here?’ 
and I’m actually upset.” 
Gaines said in an interview that his sentence about "traditional style" has been misunderstood, and he rejects the claims of cultural insensitivity that have been leveled against him. 
“I’m kind of making a comment, saying, ‘If [with] traditional-style food, or street-style food, you’re charging more for it but giving less, then you know, f— that,’” he said. 
“And that would apply to any type of food.” 
Many commenters said they appreciate that Gaines “tells it like it is.” 
“The honesty is so refreshing,” one viewer wrote. 
Others called the price “wild,” “insane” and “highway robbery.” 
But Gaines said he also received hateful direct messages, including antisemitic ones. 
Sandwich defenders also chimed in. 
One reminded angry viewers that smoked brisket would cost a comparable amount in a barbecue restaurant, in theory without the backlash. 
“This is just the standard that I want for my restaurant, and for Armenian food or Middle Eastern food in general, because it deserves to be,” Grigoryan said. 
“It’s just as technical as any other cuisine in the world, but it’s seen as cheap food on the go. 
But that doesn’t mean that somebody shouldn’t be allowed to take it up a notch and use an ingredient that they believe will make that dish better.” 
The chef said he understands why people might be surprised by the price, but in addition to rent, labor, utilities, equipment, maintenance and insurance, the sandwich ingredients alone cost him $12. 
Each sandwich at Yerord Mas includes at least half a pound of Australian Wagyu, which costs about $11.50 per pound and is cured and smoked on site. 
Smaller briskets take three to four days to brine, while larger cuts can take one week. 
His pickles take three to five days to prepare. 
And in place of the sliced Swiss cheese he used to use, there’s a more labor-intensive Mornay sauce thick with Gruyère and premium dairy from California’s Straus Family Creamery. 
The bread is made from Central Milling organic flour and baked fresh in an outdoor oven. 
Every component, Grigoryan said, takes time, and the final price reflects all of this. 
“When the entire conversation becomes, ‘These people are greedy, these people are overcharging,'” Grigoryan said, “and then all [these online comments] about Armenians being criminals, I reached the breaking point.” 
“We do all these sacrifices for our job and ... it gets reduced to a price tag,” he said. 
“Even though [customers who] matter way more than these influencers have only good things to say about us, that very small percentage seems to be so loud that it easily gets in your head.” 
Grigoryan cites the famous Big Mec  celebrity chef Ludo Lefebvre’s decadent, French-inspired burger at Petit Trois  which costs $38. 
Grigoryan said he sees its ingredients and quality as comparable to those used in his brisket basturma. 
He said the pita sandwich remains the restaurant’s top-selling item. 
“The internet loves to give negative attention,” he said. 
“It makes it seem like the online world is more blown out of proportion than what real life is.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.4%Stephanie Breijo: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias2.4%This article: 7.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias7.0%This article: 5.0%Stephanie Breijo: 8.1%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 1.9%Stephanie Breijo: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Stephanie Breijo: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 0.7%Stephanie Breijo: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.5%Stephanie Breijo: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 4.2%Stephanie Breijo: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 3.3%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 13.3%Stephanie Breijo: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias13.3%This article: 4.9%Stephanie Breijo: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.9%This article: 4.2%Stephanie Breijo: 11.2%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Stephanie Breijo: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias3.2%This article: 3.2%Stephanie Breijo: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem3.2%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.5%Stephanie Breijo: 6.4%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 2.4%Stephanie Breijo: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.5%Stephanie Breijo: 3.5%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization3.5%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.1%Stephanie Breijo: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon5.1%This article: 6.0%Stephanie Breijo: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion6.0%This article: 2.7%Stephanie Breijo: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 1.8%Stephanie Breijo: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.8%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.8%Stephanie Breijo: 4.0%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal5.8%This article: 2.5%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.5%This article: 2.7%Stephanie Breijo: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Stephanie Breijo: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.9%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.8%Stephanie Breijo: 12.8%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 2.8%Stephanie Breijo: 2.2%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination2.8%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Stephanie Breijo: 14.6%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1079 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers72%attributed speech302writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageBill Addison • 28 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 25 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 13 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 19 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 5 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 26 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 24 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 29 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRichie Gaines • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 28 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 27 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 31 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 27 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 29 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 30 words • 100.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 19 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 34 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 21 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 17 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 10 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageArthur Grigoryan • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bill Addison

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words3.6% of attributed speech67% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Bill Addison: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Bill Addison: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.