Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Furst results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 2,673 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,895 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This David Furst is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
David Furst
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%David Furst (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,895
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.9%11.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.7%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos