Topic summary
88%3 analyzed articles/videos1,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rescues results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 6,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,080 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,249 of 16,562 topics). This Rescues is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Rescues
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510068.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.7%14.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.7%11.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate