Topic summary
88% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rescues results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 6,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,080 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,249 of 16,562 topics). This Rescues is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Rescues
Topic details
Total words: 5,080
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.7% 14.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst