Topic summary
19% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,225 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reality Tv results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,437 hits . Analysis detected 9,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,194 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,724 of 16,244 topics). This Reality Tv is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Reality Tv
Topic details
Total words: 16,194
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst