Kate Gosselin Responds to Comments About Estranged Son Collin and Whether She Would Take a Lie Detector Test 9%

By Madison E. Goldberg0%

6/29/2026, 9:59:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 251 faulty-reasoning hits from 625 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,097 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the article peer group.

Kate Gosselin responded to several comments about her estranged son Collin Gosselin and addressed whether she would take a lie detector test in the comment section of a new TikTok video shared on Monday, June 29. 
Kate, 51, shared the video to discuss updates about her rescue dog, Koda, and ask her followers if they had experienced the same minor foot injury that she has. 
Several people had questions about her son Collin, 22, recently appearing on a podcast and inviting his mother to partake in a lie detector test ahead of the release of his bombshell memoir, In the Shadow of Eight: Surviving the Reality of My Childhood. 
"If you are 100% certain that the accusations against you are lies, my suggestion would be to take him to court and sue him for defamation!" 
one person wrote in the comment section. 
"I can't bc I'm a public figure," Kate replied. 
"Rules are different unfortunately. 
Or I def would!" 
In a subsequent response, Kate appeared to address a fan who asked whether she would take a lie detector test: "Ha!" 
"Malice is one of the hardest things to prove. 
I tried :("," Kate continued in another comment. 
"The rules are different for ppl in the public eye," she added. 
"I consulted a high power LA attorney (you've definitely heard of him) years ago when other ppl were putting crazy stuff out there and that's what he said. 
The courts don't honor it if you're in the public eye :(" 
The exchanges come after Collin appeared on Strange McKnights' YouTube channel for an interview about his memoir and family life. 
Among the shocking claims about Kate and his upbringing is Collin's allegation that his mother once used zip ties on his wrists and ankles and locked him in a basement. 
"But I'm not going to talk much on that because I'm putting all this in a tell- all that I'm writing right now and we will be going into detail on every single thing," Collin said after recounting the story. 
"However, speaking on the topic of zip ties, if I may add a thought, I know you're probably going to ask about this, but I did just say on social media that I would like to invite my mom to do a lie detector test," Collin said. 
"And that would be one of the questions, mom, if you're listening to this, we would ask about the zip ties." 
Also on Saturday, Collin shared a headline from the New York Post about Kate on his Instagram Stories that read, "Kate Gosselin 'spiraling' ahead of estranged son Collin's bombshell memoir: 'She knows it's about to hit the fan.' 
" 
Collin used a filter to blur out his mom's face and shared a comment from a follower that read, "What's done in darkness will always come to light," PEOPLE previously reported. 
Never miss a story  sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 
The Gosselin family was the subject of the reality show Jon & Kate Plus 8, which ran for six seasons on TLC, starting in 2007. 
Kate divorced Jon, 48, in 2009 amid reports of infidelity surrounding her now ex-husband. 
The two share 21-year-old sextuplets Hannah, Leah, Alexis, Joel, Aaden and Collin, as well as 24-year-old twins Mady and Cara. 
The family's lives in Pennsylvania were documented for two years on the hit series. 
In the Shadow of Eight: Surviving the Reality of My Childhood is set to hit shelves on Oct. 
13. 
Read the original article on People 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Madison E. Goldberg: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias6.1%This article: 11.8%Madison E. Goldberg: 3.9%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 7.6%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.5%Madison E. Goldberg: 3.0%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority4.5%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.9%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.6%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization1.9%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 1.7%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion5.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.8%Madison E. Goldberg: 1.6%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Madison E. Goldberg: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Madison E. Goldberg: 5.4%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.1%

625 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers40%attributed speech372writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 4 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 21 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 8 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 28 words • 0.0% coverageKate Gosselin • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageCollin • 40 words • 0.0% coverageCollin • 47 words • 0.0% coverageCollin • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coveragePEOPLE • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coveragePEOPLE • 6 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

PEOPLE

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words15% of attributed speech35% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%PEOPLE: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%PEOPLE: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.