Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gosselin Family results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 3,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,975 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,479 of 16,562 topics). This Gosselin Family is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Gosselin Family
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,975
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos