Topic summary
41% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Private Partnerships results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,655 hits . Analysis detected 12,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,085 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,865 of 15,769 topics). This Public Private Partnerships is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Public Private Partnerships
Topic details
Total words: 13,085
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst