Author summary
87%1 analyzed article/video561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kylie Jones results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 1,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,683 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,639 of 6,598 authors). This Kylie Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Kylie Jones
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
76%Kylie Jones (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,683
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.7%18.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.6%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos