Topic summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos3,445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Produce Safety results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,395 hits. Analysis detected 12,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,879 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,678 of 16,562 topics). This Produce Safety is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Produce Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,879
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos