Is it safe to eat produce? A rise in diarrhea-causing cyclosporiasis sparks fears of fruits, vegetables 30%

By Karen Garcia60% Hannah Fry49%

7/14/2026, 8:09:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 881 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,328 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the article peer group.

A surge in parasitic disease cases that can cause a prolonged bout of debilitating diarrhea is prompting growing concerns from public health officials and questions from the public about the safety of fresh produce. 
Experts say the risk varies in different parts of the country. 
In California, basic washing of produce remains sufficient, they said. 
California has reported 41 cases of cyclosporiasis this year, but none of them have been linked to a recent multistate outbreak, according to local public health officials. 
The situation in other states is more concerning. 
Cyclosporiasis is an intestinal illness caused by the microscopic parasite Cyclospora cayetanensis, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
People contract the illness by consuming food or water contaminated with the feces of a person infected by the parasite. 
The epicenter of the cyclosporiasis outbreak is in Michigan, where the state public health department has reported more than 3,000 cases of the illness, including 44 cases requiring hospitalization. 
On Tuesday, the Michigan health department said, “available information indicates that lettuce or salad greens may be a potential source of this outbreak”; however, other food items cannot be completely ruled out. 
In the U.S., food-borne outbreaks of cyclosporiasis have been linked to various types of fresh produce imported from Latin America, including raspberries, cilantro, basil, snow peas and mixed salad, according to the California Department of Public Health. 
At least 34 states have separately reported between tens and hundreds of cases of cyclosporiasis this summer. 
Since May 1, the CDC has received more than 1,600 confirmed domestic cases and is aware of more than 5,100 cases that require further analysis to confirm the illness as domestically acquired cyclosporiasis. 
Officials say the true number of cases is likely higher because some people recover without medical care and are not tested for the parasite. 
For those who have fallen ill, treatment includes an antibiotic called Bactrim. 
“It does result in serious diarrhea, what we call explosive diarrhea, in some patients,” said Dr. 
Shruti K. 
Gohil, the associate medical director of epidemiology and infection prevention at UCI Health. 
“Other patients may have mild diarrhea, pass it, not even know that they were infected.” 
At this time, a specific type of produce, grower or supplier has not been identified as the source of each state outbreak. 
Officials say there could be multiple sources. 
Taco Bell restaurants in the Detriot area are being investigated as potential sources of the illness. 
Restaurant customers in the area were told last week that the chain was “currently unable to sell lettuce, cilantro, onion, pico de gallo and guacamole due to a nationwide recall,” the Washington Post reported. 
But people don’t have to stop consuming fruits and vegetables, Gohil said. 
Washing produce thoroughly with water or with a produce wash can help reduce the risk of cyclosporiasis infection. 
“Washing will reduce the risk. 
It doesn’t eliminate it, so it’s sort of a numbers game,” said Dr. 
Charles Bailey, the medical director of infection prevention at Providence St. 
Joseph and Providence Mission Hospitals in Orange County. 
“If I were living in Michigan, I think I’d probably not be anxious to be consuming raw fruits or vegetables, you know, for the rest of the summer.” 
“We see upticks in the summer routinely, although this is the largest I can remember,” Bailey said. 
Cyclosporiasis isn’t a year-round concern in the United States  case counts rise typically between May and August  and the outbreak will probably conclude at the end of summer, he said. 
“This one I would predict might last longer than previous ones just because of the numbers,” Bailey said. 
“It’s got quite a headwind, but you know it’s not something that would become endemic.” 
Brandon Brown, an epidemiologist and professor of medicine with the UC Riverside School of Medicine, contracted the illness in 2018 from what he believes was a salad he ate during a trip. 
Despite his experience and the multiple outbreaks in other parts of the U.S., Brown’s advice is: “Don’t stop eating your greens, because they help keep us alive.” 
Brown said he was initially diagnosed with “bad food poisoning,” but after his multiple visits to urgent care and shedding 20 pounds, the healthcare team conducted a diagnostic fecal test and discovered Brown had cyclosporiasis. 
“Thinking back to 2018, the worst part was the lethargy and not being able to keep food inside me,” he said in a news release. 
“As someone who exercises every day, I also noticed that I did not have the energy to do that, and I would have to make frequent restroom visits.” 
News of cyclosporiasis and the resulting diarrhea has spread widely on social media in recent days with some saying that it could give GLP-1s a run for the money in the weight loss realm. 
But, experts say, this is one horribly uncomfortable  and potentially dangerous  way to shed a few pounds. 
If left untreated, a cyclosporiasis infection can lead to dehydration quickly in the warm summer months, particularly among the elderly, young children and those with a compromised immune system. 
“It’s not pleasant,” Gohil said. 
“The best way to put it is it’s not a good long-term weight-reduction strategy.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Karen Garcia: 2.7%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Karen Garcia: 4.1%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic13.5%This article: 4.2%Karen Garcia: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Karen Garcia: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 7.5%Karen Garcia: 8.4%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Karen Garcia: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.6%Karen Garcia: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.6%This article: 3.9%Karen Garcia: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias3.9%This article: 16.5%Karen Garcia: 7.9%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias16.5%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Karen Garcia: 2.8%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.6%Karen Garcia: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.7%Karen Garcia: 6.6%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority18.7%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 1.7%Karen Garcia: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope1.7%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.5%Karen Garcia: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization11.5%This article: 1.8%Karen Garcia: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring1.8%This article: 3.9%Karen Garcia: 1.6%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon3.9%This article: 14.8%Karen Garcia: 8.2%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion14.8%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 2.0%Karen Garcia: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.6%Karen Garcia: 0.6%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof3.6%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.7%Karen Garcia: 3.6%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal18.7%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%Karen Garcia: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.3%Karen Garcia: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote5.3%This article: 1.8%Karen Garcia: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 4.8%Karen Garcia: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 4.4%Karen Garcia: 3.4%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Karen Garcia: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

881 words analyzed.

Speakers

15speakers65%attributed speech305writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coveragelocal public health officials • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCenters for Disease Control and Prevention • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragestate public health department • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan health department • 32 words • 0.0% coverageCalifornia Department of Public Health • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCDC • 33 words • 0.0% coverageofficials • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDr. • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageUCI Health • 13 words • 0.0% coverageShruti K. Gohil • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageofficials • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWashington Post • 34 words • 0.0% coverageShruti K. Gohil • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDr. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageProvidence St. • 11 words • 0.0% coverageProvidence Mission Hospitals • 8 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Bailey • 28 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Bailey • 17 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Bailey • 32 words • 100.0% coverageCharles Bailey • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCharles Bailey • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Brown • 27 words • 100.0% coverageBrandon Brown • 35 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Brown • 25 words • 0.0% coverageBrandon Brown • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageShruti K. Gohil • 5 words • 0.0% coverageShruti K. Gohil • 14 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brandon Brown

100%flagged-word coverage
115 attributed words20% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+23.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brandon Brown: 23.5%23.5%Unattributed Quote-13.1 ptsWriter: 13.1%Brandon Brown: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Brandon Brown: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.