Topic summary
45%8 analyzed articles/videos3,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prince Harry results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 2,869 hits. Analysis detected 24,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,542 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,267 of 16,562 topics). This Prince Harry is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510019.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate