Topic summary
45% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prince Harry results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 2,869 hits . Analysis detected 24,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,542 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (13,267 of 16,562 topics). This Prince Harry is better (less manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. Prince Harry
Topic details
Total words: 28,542
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst