Topic summary
67%18 analyzed articles/videos19,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Rhetoric results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 10,678 hits. Analysis detected 98,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 80,212 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,907 of 16,562 topics). This Political Rhetoric is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score18 analyzed articles80.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Can Benjamin Netanyahu Be Stopped?52%
The New Republic72%By Yonatan Touval79%7/22/2026, 10:00:00 AM
Transcript: Trump’s Rage at Journos Boils Over—and Even Fox Is Rattled83%
The New Republic72%By The Daily Blast68% Greg Sargent73%7/20/2026, 10:58:02 AM
Trump revived his election lies. The people who run elections are bracing for the midterms.78%
MS NOW95%By Hunter Woodall98%7/18/2026, 10:00:00 AM
How a man once ordered to pay libel damages helped launch an investigation into Islamic private schools25%
The Texas Tribune15%By Lexi Churchill64%7/18/2026, 3:10:00 AM
Red state's GOP election chief blows a hole in Trump's primetime speech scare64%
Raw Story93%By Daniel Hampton75%7/18/2026, 12:50:57 AM
Himes calls Trump’s election speech ‘easily disprovable lies’73%
CT Mirror20%By Lisa Hagen0%7/17/2026, 8:02:03 PM
No President Has Embarrassed This Country the Way Trump Did Last Night68%
The New Republic72%By Michael Tomasky64%7/17/2026, 2:45:27 PM
Interfaith leaders condemn Trump’s attacks on St. Paul kindergarteners in hijabs36%
Sahan Journal10%By Becky Z. Dernbach0%7/8/2026, 9:50:14 PM
California Sees Historic Crime Rate Drops in Every Category, Except This One68%
KQED61%By Katie DeBenedetti69%7/6/2026, 10:33:53 PM
A Fourth of July in Kamala Harris’ USA74%
Salon.com76%By Sophia Tesfaye90%7/4/2026, 10:45:05 AM