Topic summary
â 47% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Philosophy results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 3,829 hits . Analysis detected 35,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,116 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 20% (12,638 of 15,753 topics). This Political Philosophy is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group. Political Philosophy
Topic details
Total words: 36,116
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles36.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst