Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Johnson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 223 hits . Analysis detected 2,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,351 of 6,629 authors). This Matt Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group. Matt Johnson
Author details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst