The Blaze80%

Teddy Roosevelt's SECRET letter proves progressivism was always headed to THIS 83%

By BlazeTV Staff87%

7/18/2026, 6:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 150 hits. Analysis detected 1,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 476 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.6% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,631 of 20,516 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.30% of the article peer group.

On July 4, the $450 million Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library opened its doors to the public  a public that, according to a letter in a library exhibit, Roosevelt felt was similar to cattle. 
In the letter written to Charles Davenport at Cold Spring Harbor in his own hand, he explained that “society has no business permitting degenerates to reproduce their kind.” 
Roosevelt wrote in the letter, “We have to refuse to apply human beings the same elementary knowledge every farmer applies to his own stock. 
And that’s madness.” 
“The farmers who let all the increase come from the worst stock would be threatened as fit inmates for an asylum,” he added. 
Roosevelt also wrote that the “inescapable duty of the good citizen of the right type is to leave his blood behind him in the world.” 
“We have no business permitting the perpetuation of a citizen of the wrong type,” he said. 
Like most progressives, Glenn points out that Roosevelt made it clear that he believed in “categories.” 
“This fight is about categories,” he says. 
“It’s about, you know, the collective and not the individual in his own hand to the director of the Carnegie-funded scientific institute. 
This was not the fringe. 
This is the cutting edge. 
This is the settled science that you must pay attention to of the time.” 
“Theodore Roosevelt believed in the science and in the expert and in the government strong enough and clever enough to act upon what the experts knew. 
That’s progressivism all in one letter,” he explains. 
“Now, was he great with the national parks? 
Yeah, he was great on national parks. 
Was he great on the individual and the man in the arena? 
Yeah, he was brave. 
He was funny. 
He read a book every day. 
A book every day. 
He took a bullet in Milwaukee and finished the speech. 
He set aside 230 million acres. 
That’s not the argument,” he continues. 
“The argument is what he thought the American government was for,” he adds. 
Glenn explains that Roosevelt also believed that “property is subject to the community’s right to regulate its use” and that government officials were the “stewards of the public welfare” rather than “servants of the law.” 
“In a speech he called a 'Charter for Democracy,' he proposed when a court strikes down a progressive statute, the people should be able to vote to overturn the court. 
Former president of the United States in 1912 proposing a popular recall of judicial decisions. 
That’s not constitutional. 
That’s not how it works,” Glenn says. 
“Theodore Roosevelt is exactly what we’re seeing. 
He’s just dressed up in prettier clothes. 
He’s not a despicable man where Woodrow Wilson is just a despicable man,” he says, adding, “And I don’t think he actually saw what was coming.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.6%BlazeTV Staff: 8.1%Blaze Media: 5.5%Confirmation Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%BlazeTV Staff: 5.2%Blaze Media: 3.1%Availability Heuristic12.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.7%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.7%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%BlazeTV Staff: 3.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias1.7%This article: 6.7%BlazeTV Staff: 10.6%Blaze Media: 9.7%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.5%BlazeTV Staff: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.3%BlazeTV Staff: 9.3%Blaze Media: 9.6%Negativity Bias30.3%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.3%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%BlazeTV Staff: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error5.5%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%BlazeTV Staff: 4.8%Blaze Media: 2.8%In-Group Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 2.6%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%BlazeTV Staff: 6.8%Blaze Media: 2.7%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.8%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias0.8%This article: 6.9%BlazeTV Staff: 1.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%BlazeTV Staff: 1.5%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem6.9%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 2.1%Blaze Media: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.0%BlazeTV Staff: 3.7%Blaze Media: 3.8%Appeal to Authority8.0%This article: 4.2%BlazeTV Staff: 2.7%Blaze Media: 2.3%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.6%BlazeTV Staff: 13.4%Blaze Media: 9.1%Hasty Generalization11.6%This article: 1.3%BlazeTV Staff: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring1.3%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.8%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.1%BlazeTV Staff: 12.2%Blaze Media: 8.0%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 6.7%BlazeTV Staff: 1.8%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question6.7%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 2.9%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.6%BlazeTV Staff: 1.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.6%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.1%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.5%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division1.5%This article: 3.4%BlazeTV Staff: 7.4%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal3.4%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.9%BlazeTV Staff: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.9%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 7.1%BlazeTV Staff: 0.8%Blaze Media: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy7.1%This article: 31.5%BlazeTV Staff: 2.9%Blaze Media: 2.7%Unattributed Quote31.5%This article: 2.3%BlazeTV Staff: 2.8%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 7.8%BlazeTV Staff: 11.4%Blaze Media: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice7.8%This article: 10.1%BlazeTV Staff: 7.4%Blaze Media: 4.6%Indoctrination10.1%This article: 3.4%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 9.2%Blaze Media: 7.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 6.6%Blaze Media: 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

476 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker62%attributed speech179writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageGlenn • 16 words • 100.0% coverageGlenn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 5 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 14 words • 100.0% coverageGlenn • 26 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 12 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 10 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 6 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 13 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 35 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGlenn • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Glenn

96%flagged-word coverage
297 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Unattributed Quote-83.8 ptsWriter: 83.8%Glenn: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-20.7 ptsWriter: 20.7%Glenn: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-14.3 ptsWriter: 19.0%Glenn: 4.7%4.7%Quote-first Misdirection-6.1 ptsWriter: 6.1%Glenn: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B+5.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Glenn: 5.4%5.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.