Speaker summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glenn results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hindsight Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 59.3% saturation with 273 hits. Analysis detected 607.072 faulty-reasoning hits from 468 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (20,209 of 26,964 speakers). This Glenn is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Glenn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 468
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
16.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos468 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 59.4%59.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.3%38.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 59.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos