Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,026 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel J. Abrams results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 348 hits . Analysis detected 3,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,169 of 6,498 authors). This Samuel J. Abrams is better (less manipulative) than 64.20% of the peer group. Samuel J. Abrams
Author details
Total words: 4,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst