Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political And Civil Unrest results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 568 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 94% (1,008 of 16,562 topics). This Political And Civil Unrest is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Political And Civil Unrest
Topic details
Total words: 568
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.9% percentile 11.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles568 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.5% 30.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 38.7% 38.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 38.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst