Topic summary
76% 7 analyzed articles/videos 7,515 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Reform results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 3,588 hits . Analysis detected 26,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,095 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,981 of 16,562 topics). This Police Reform is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Police Reform
Topic details
Total words: 25,095
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles25.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst