Author summary
41% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominic Adler results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 2,485 hits . Analysis detected 13,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,139 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,262 of 6,628 authors). This Dominic Adler is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Dominic Adler
Author details
Total words: 12,139
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.5% 20.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.5%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 14.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst