Author summary
28% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex N. Gecan results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,882 hits . Analysis detected 10,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,608 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,412 of 6,170 authors). This Alex N. Gecan is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group. Alex N. Gecan
Author details
Total words: 16,608
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst