Author summary
36% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Arredondo results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,016 hits . Analysis detected 5,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,503 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,991 of 6,359 authors). This Vanessa Arredondo is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Vanessa Arredondo
Author details
Total words: 7,503
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst