Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Process results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,534 hits. Analysis detected 11,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,084 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,521 of 16,343 topics). This Peace Process is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Peace Process
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.7%9.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos