Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These PETER MORRISON results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 266 hits . Analysis detected 1,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,502 authors). This PETER MORRISON is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. PETER MORRISON
Author details
Total words: 2,768
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst