Topic summary
61%9 analyzed articles/videos4,038 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parks And Recreation results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,557 hits. Analysis detected 19,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,615 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,179 of 16,562 topics). This Parks And Recreation is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate