BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 513 faulty-reasoning hits from 245 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,781 of 21,196 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the article peer group.

Oakland County Parks and Bloomfield Hills Schools are working together to turn natural areas into public parks. 
Officials say that this partnership is designed to protect the sites for the long term, give more residents easier access and keep school programs going. 
Oakland County Parks Director Chris Ward and Bloomfield Hills Schools Superintendent Rick West say the plan will make the land more open to the community while preserving a special natural area in a suburban neighborhood. 
Since Bloomfield Hills doesn’t have any public parks, this change is a big deal for local residents. 
Sites like the Johnson Nature Center may eventually connect to walking paths, including a safe route through the city. 
Students already use these sites for their lessons. 
A fifth-grade class took a field trip to the Johnson Nature Center recently to learn about the local watershed. 
West says the center is a valuable natural area in the midst of the highly developed community. 
“It’s… nature at its best, right here, nestled in Bloomfield Township, and our students get to benefit from it. 
Our community gets to benefit from it, and that’s the richness of the partnership [with Oakland County Parks],” he says. 
This agreement is a teamwork effort between the school district and the parks department, aimed at benefiting both recreation and education for students, local residents, and the entire county. 
This story is a part of WDET’s ongoing series, the Detroit Tree Canopy Project . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 36.3%Amanda LeClaire: 5.9%WDET: 1.7%Confirmation Bias36.3%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 1.9%WDET: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Amanda LeClaire: 2.2%WDET: 2.3%Availability Heuristic10.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Amanda LeClaire: 2.2%WDET: 4.6%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 1.0%WDET: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 22.0%Amanda LeClaire: 6.5%WDET: 3.2%Optimism Bias22.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.6%WDET: 0.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Amanda LeClaire: 7.3%WDET: 3.4%Negativity Bias6.9%This article: 8.2%Amanda LeClaire: 2.1%WDET: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 1.1%WDET: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Amanda LeClaire: 6.5%WDET: 5.9%Halo Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.8%Amanda LeClaire: 1.1%WDET: 0.9%Recency Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 21.2%Amanda LeClaire: 9.3%WDET: 3.2%Appeal to Authority21.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.9%Amanda LeClaire: 5.1%WDET: 3.4%Hasty Generalization6.9%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.2%WDET: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.9%Amanda LeClaire: 10.2%WDET: 4.8%Appeal to Emotion22.9%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 1.1%WDET: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.2%Amanda LeClaire: 1.4%WDET: 0.3%Burden of Proof10.2%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 11.8%Amanda LeClaire: 1.6%WDET: 0.2%Composition/Division11.8%This article: 11.0%Amanda LeClaire: 2.6%WDET: 1.9%Anecdotal11.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.3%WDET: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 2.7%WDET: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.8%Amanda LeClaire: 2.1%WDET: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection7.8%This article: 17.1%Amanda LeClaire: 4.2%WDET: 4.0%Biased Writer Voice17.1%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 11.1%WDET: 2.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 0.0%WDET: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amanda LeClaire: 4.0%WDET: 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

245 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers50%attributed speech122writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageOakland County Parks and Bloomfield Hills Schools • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageChris Ward • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRick West • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRick West • 19 words • 100.0% coverageRick West • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWDET • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chris Ward

100%flagged-word coverage
35 attributed words28% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-34.4 ptsWriter: 34.4%Chris Ward: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.