Author summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos245 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda LeClaire results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 1,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,791 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,899 of 6,363 authors). This Amanda LeClaire is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Amanda LeClaire
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Amanda LeClaire (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,791
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 11.1%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos