Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,154 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ethan Rauschkolb results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 1,332 hits . Analysis detected 9,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,462 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,696 of 6,628 authors). This Ethan Rauschkolb is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. Ethan Rauschkolb
Author details
Total words: 6,462
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.4% percentile 3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 20.6% 20.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 20.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst