Topic summary
72% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parks results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,253 hits . Analysis detected 11,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,532 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,194 of 15,447 topics). This Parks is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Parks
Topic details
Total words: 13,532
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst