Gothamist78%

Brooklyn man rescued after 6 hours stuck in upstate cave 1%

By Jon Campbell0%

5/22/2026, 6:07:59 PM

Topics: Caves, New York, Parks
Keywords: Caves, New York, Parks

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 283 faulty-reasoning hits from 541 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 1% (20,244 of 20,363 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the article peer group.

A New York City man spent six hours stuck in a small crevice inside a dark, bat-filled cave in upstate New York before a rescue team was able to drill him free earlier this week, according to the state Department of Environmental Conservation. 
The Brooklyn resident got trapped Sunday evening in a small opening between rocks inside a cavernous marble structure known as Merlin’s Cave in the small town of Canaan, about 45 minutes from Albany, on the Massachusetts border. 
Forest Ranger Lt. 
John Gullen said the man was exploring with a group of people when he got stuck while trying to navigate a portion of Merlin’s Cave known as the “Bear Trap”  which the ranger described as a tight crawlway that gets progressively narrower and has a stream running underneath. 
“The rock is very slippery, and he just had a slip in the wrong spot and then fell in,” Gullen said in a video released by the conservation department. 
“And as he was falling, he just kept sliding a little bit further, and then as he was trying to get out, it was just making him wedge further down until the point where he was completely immobilized.” 
“It was like his full body was stuck in a crevice that was basically designed the exact shape as him,” the ranger continued. 
The Brooklyn man was just 400 feet from the entrance to the cave, but it takes about 20 minutes to navigate because of the extremely tight quarters, Gullen said. 
On the other side of the Bear Trap is a series of canyons, rooms, domes, waterfalls and plunge pools, according to the Northeast Cave Conservancy, which owns the cave. 
After some members of his party exited the cave and called 911, a rescue team was able to reach the man around 9 p.m. 
By that point, three other members of the party who stayed behind with the man had found a hammer in the cave and were able to chip away some of the rock. 
Gullen said he and a member of the Albany-Schoharie Cave Rescue Team worked for nearly two hours to free the man and were able to move him 6 to 10 inches. 
At that point, they retrieved a hammer drill to chip away at the rock  drilling inches from the man’s head and following up with a hammer before they were finally after to extricate him. 
The ranger said the man was cracking jokes and giving rescuers a thumbs up while he was stuck, even as he was slipping into hypothermia. 
He was freed just after 2 a.m. 
Monday. 
“He did a phenomenal job staying calm,” Gullen said in the video. 
“I don't know very many people who could stay calm. 
He was stuck for a total of six hours, unable to move basically in any direction. 
For most people that's like their worst nightmare.” 
The Department of Environmental Conservation didn’t release the name of the Brooklyn man and blurred his face in photos, citing a policy of not outing the people rescued by its rangers and officers. 
The man was treated for hypothermia but did not have any other injuries, according to the agency. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 2.2%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Jon Campbell: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias5.4%This article: 1.8%Jon Campbell: 1.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 4.3%Jon Campbell: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Jon Campbell: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 7.9%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 3.1%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Jon Campbell: 7.2%Gothamist: 8.6%Negativity Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 5.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.1%Jon Campbell: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect11.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.6%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 2.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 2.8%Gothamist: 4.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 1.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Jon Campbell: 3.0%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 6.1%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.4%Jon Campbell: 1.5%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.4%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.9%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.7%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.4%Jon Campbell: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote5.4%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.1%Jon Campbell: 4.2%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice9.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Campbell: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

541 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers65%attributed speech190writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Environmental Conservation • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 49 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 29 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 38 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNortheast Cave Conservancy • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Gullen • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Environmental Conservation • 33 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Environmental Conservation • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

John Gullen

83%flagged-word coverage
229 attributed words65% of attributed speech26% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+21.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Gullen: 21.4%21.4%Unattributed Quote+12.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%John Gullen: 12.7%12.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.