Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caves results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Overconfidence Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 326 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ā 8% (14,315 of 15,522 topics). This Caves is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Caves
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 8%Caves (selected)2%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Representativeness Heurisā€¦Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos