Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Farmer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 1,672 hits . Analysis detected 6,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,332 of 6,348 authors). This Megan Farmer is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Megan Farmer
Author details
Total words: 6,304
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.9% 16.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 26.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst