Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juan Pablo Chiquiza results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 1,639 hits . Analysis detected 6,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,845 of 6,360 authors). This Juan Pablo Chiquiza is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Juan Pablo Chiquiza
Author details
Total words: 5,580
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.0% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.6% 11.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 29.4% 29.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 29.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst