Topic summary
48% 14 analyzed articles/videos 12,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pakistan results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 4,313 hits . Analysis detected 45,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,730 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (14,290 of 16,562 topics). This Pakistan is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Pakistan
Topic details
Total words: 54,730
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles54.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst