Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video4,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saif Khalid results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,090 hits. Analysis detected 9,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,108 of 6,135 authors). This Saif Khalid is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Saif Khalid
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
17%Saif Khalid (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,242
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

17% percentile
025507510016.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.9%6.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos