Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Asfandyar Mir results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 972 hits . Analysis detected 5,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,385 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Asfandyar Mir is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Asfandyar Mir
Author details
Total words: 5,385
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.7% 7.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 18.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst