Topic summary
76% 17 analyzed articles/videos 8,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 3,142 hits . Analysis detected 39,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,101 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,397 of 15,689 topics). This Oil is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Oil
Topic details
Total words: 38,101
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score17 analyzed articles38.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst