Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ntsb Investigation results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 1,130 hits. Analysis detected 4,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,220 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,755 of 16,562 topics). This Ntsb Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Ntsb Investigation
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 19.2%19.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 19.2%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos