Topic summary
92% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Politics results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 3,903 hits . Analysis detected 29,367 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,804 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (7,622 of 15,400 topics). This New York City Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. New York City Politics
Topic details
Total words: 19,804
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.7% 19.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst