Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nato Summit results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 2,150 hits . Analysis detected 18,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,748 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (14,007 of 15,689 topics). This Nato Summit is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Nato Summit
Topic details
Total words: 22,748
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst