Author summary
ā 0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suzan Fraser results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 894 hits . Analysis detected 5,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,988 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ā 27% (4,611 of 6,244 authors). This Suzan Fraser is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Suzan Fraser
Author details
Total words: 8,988
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst