Author summary
50% 2 analyzed articles/videos 775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marthe van der Wolf results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 613 hits . Analysis detected 5,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,976 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,914 of 6,628 authors). This Marthe van der Wolf is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Marthe van der Wolf
Author details
Total words: 6,976
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst