Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timothy Nerozzi results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 728 hits . Analysis detected 4,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 39% (3,922 of 6,427 authors). This Timothy Nerozzi is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Timothy Nerozzi
Author details
Total words: 5,484
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst