Topic summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos2,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Events results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,209 hits. Analysis detected 9,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,428 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,765 of 16,562 topics). This National Events is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate