Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Events results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,209 hits . Analysis detected 9,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,428 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,765 of 16,562 topics). This National Events is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. National Events
Topic details
Total words: 12,428
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst