Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 913 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zara Morris results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Anchoring Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 315 hits . Analysis detected 1,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,652 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,148 of 6,365 authors). This Zara Morris is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Zara Morris
Author details
Total words: 3,652
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst